Questionnaire based responses from the firms surveyed are aggregated in the following three ways.

1. Firm Level Data
   Here responses of individual firms are presented in the form of following 2 dashboards:
   1. Distribution of Firms ^✝
   2. Firm Level Multi-indicator Comparison
2. State Level Aggregation
   Here percentage of innovative firms in a State or Union Territory (UT) responding to a question in a specific way has been calculated and compared. This data is presented in the form of following 2 dashboards:
   1. Innovation Indicator Across States
   2. State Level Multi-indicator Comparison
3. Industry Level Aggregation
   Here percentage of innovative firms in an industry responding to a question in a specific way has been calculated and compared. This data is presented in form of following dashboard:
   1. Industry Level Multi-indicator Comparison

Surveyed firms were categorized on different basis to understand trend of innovation indicators across firm categories. The analysis is presented in the following dashboards:

1. Percentage of Innovative Firms Across Indicators - Surveyed firms were categorized on the basis of responses to questions, and percentage of innovative firms across various responses to each question is presented.
2. Innovation Indicators Across Firm Categories - Surveyed firms were categorized on the basis of eight different profile parameters namely Workforce Size, Age of Firm, Ownership Type, Kind of Innovation, R&D and Non-R&D Innovations, Non-technological Innovations, State/UT, and Industry. For any of these profile parameters, percentage of innovative firms responding to a question in a specific way was calculated and compared across other parameters and categories.

Innovation support system has been seen in three different segments, namely, National Innovation System (NIS), Regional Innovation System (RIS), and Sectoral Innovation System (SIS). There are institutions/organisations at national level created to augment the firms’ initiatives to innovations. Together the support system is grouped as National Innovation System (NIS). The effectiveness of the NIS is examined by the extent of its use by the innovative firms at the State/UT levels. States/UTs have been considered as regions. The regional or State/UT level factors that can augment innovation activities of the firms are grouped as Regional Innovation System (RIS). Some of these factors considered here are: State/UT level infrastructure (road. Power etc), human resource generation (health and education) along with extent of industrialisation and per capita NSDP (Net State Domestic Product) have been used. Different sectors have different innovation dynamics. Under a particular economic, industrial and other policy environment certain sectors might show more dynamism towards innovation compared to other sectors. Such sectors develop their own systems of Innovation and innovation dynamics. Such innovation dynamics have been grouped into Sectoral Innovation System (SIS). The correlation between support systems and innovation indicator is presented in the form of following 3 dashboards:

1. Role of National Innovation System
2. Role of Regional Innovation system
3. Role of Sectoral Innovation System

The survey results are compared with the available findings from other countries. The surveys in different countries differ on emphases on different indicators. The present comparison is based on the common set of indicators with Indian survey. The comparison is presented in the following dashboard:

1. International Comparison

Profile of each State and Union Territory (UT) of India that were surveyed is presented in the dashboard of this section. Since some indicators would not bring much insight individually for a State/UT, those indicators have been showed comparatively in a separate tab in the dashboard. Rest all indicators are presented for each State/UT individually in another tab of the dashboard. Following is the link to the dashboard:

1. State Profile